PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFJL vs. UXJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFJL vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 11.66% return.


TFJL

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-4.14%
1Y
-2.72%
3Y*
-1.72%
5Y*
-3.76%
10Y*

UXJA

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.66%
6M
11.51%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFJL vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFJL and UXJA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFJL vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFJL
TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJA
UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFJL vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFJLUXJADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

2.20

-2.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.42

2.98

-3.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.38

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

3.03

-3.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.73

13.05

-13.78

TFJL vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFJL and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFJLUXJADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

2.20

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

1.04

-1.52

Drawdowns

TFJL vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than UXJA's maximum drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and UXJA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFJLUXJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-20.01%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-9.83%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.83%

-0.67%

-22.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-2.97%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.27%

+1.47%

Volatility

TFJL vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) is 1.99%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that TFJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFJLUXJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

3.40%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.67%

10.05%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.22%

13.54%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.34%

18.59%

-9.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.03%

18.59%

-9.56%

TFJL vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFJL vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TFJL nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TFJL and UXJA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UXJA has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TFJL (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 29.61% vs -2.72% for TFJL. On fees, TFJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TFJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 29.61% return vs -2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TFJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

TFJL and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.85% for UXJA.

UXJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFJL and UXJA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer