TFJL vs. PMMY
TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and PMMY (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFJL returned -3.18% vs 5.12% for PMMY. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMMY.
Performance
TFJL vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly lower than PMMY's 2.33% return.
TFJL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- -3.18%
- 3Y*
- -1.72%
- 5Y*
- -3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
PMMY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFJL vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly | -3.81% | -3.88% |
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 2.33% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFJL and PMMY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFJL vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank
TFJL
PMMY
TFJL vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFJL | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.98 | -1.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 8.60 | -8.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 48.81 | -49.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFJL vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and PMMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFJL | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.45% | -0.60% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -0.60% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.99% | -0.07% | -23.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.14% | -0.05% | -15.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 0.11% | +4.13% |
Volatility
TFJL vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.62%. This indicates that TFJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFJL | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 0.62% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.06% | 1.13% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.37% | 1.31% | +7.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.42% | 1.51% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 1.51% | +7.52% |
TFJL vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFJL vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison
Neither TFJL nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TFJL and PMMY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFJL has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to PMMY (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs PMMY's -0.60%.
On 1-year performance, PMMY leads with 5.12% vs -3.18% for TFJL. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PMMY has performed better with a 5.12% return vs -3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TFJL.
TFJL and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.50% for PMMY.
PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.93 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFJL and PMMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer