TFJL vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFJL returned -2.72% vs 19.61% for FBUF. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

TFJL vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's 5.32% return.

TFJL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: -2.72%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -3.76%
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFJL vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-2.35%	-0.81%	1.09%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	14.01%	10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TFJL and FBUF is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024	0.08

Return for Risk

TFJL vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFJL

TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFJL vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFJL	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	2.63	-2.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	3.55	-3.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.53	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	3.51	-3.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	15.68	-16.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TFJL vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFJL and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFJL	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	2.63	-2.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	1.47	-1.95

Drawdowns

TFJL vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFJL	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.45%	-11.09%	-14.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-5.61%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.83%	-0.22%	-22.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.02%	-1.38%	-13.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	1.25%	+2.49%

Volatility

TFJL vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 1.11%. This indicates that TFJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFJL	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	1.11%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.67%	5.37%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.22%	7.49%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.34%	9.55%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.03%	9.55%	-0.52%

TFJL vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

TFJL vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

TFJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFJL and FBUF in my portfolio?

TFJL and FBUF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFJL or FBUF?

TFJL has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to FBUF (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, TFJL or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs -2.72% for TFJL. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FBUF has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFJL or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs -2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFJL or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TFJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFJL or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for TFJL.

What is the main difference between TFJL and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TFJL and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.