PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFJL vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TFJL vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TFJL vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TFJL
Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly
-0.36%-0.81%-1.50%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.


TFJL

1D
0.34%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-2.81%
1Y
-4.98%
3Y*
-2.28%
5Y*
-3.49%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TFJL vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TFJL vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFJL
TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFJL vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFJLBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

1.23

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.76

1.86

-2.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.31

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

1.71

-2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

9.81

-10.56

TFJL vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFJL and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFJLBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

1.23

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

1.02

-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between TFJL and BUFP is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TFJL vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

TFJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Drawdowns

TFJL vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TFJLBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.45%

-11.98%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-8.16%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.26%

-2.54%

-18.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-1.08%

-13.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

1.42%

+4.09%

Volatility

TFJL vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TFJLBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.41%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.04%

4.99%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

11.11%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.29%

9.79%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.10%

9.79%

-0.69%