TFBYX vs. DBLSX
TFBYX (American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund) and DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TFBYX returned 3.00%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for DBLSX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TFBYX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBLSX.
Performance
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFBYX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.06% return.
TFBYX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- —
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFBYX American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund | 0.90% | 5.58% | 5.81% | 7.22% | -3.86% | 0.70% | 2.74% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 1.06% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFBYX and DBLSX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFBYX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank
TFBYX
DBLSX
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund (TFBYX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFBYX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 2.06 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 6.27 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 28.69 | -19.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFBYX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 3.76 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.85 | 2.28 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 0.05 | +1.73 |
Drawdowns
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFBYX drawdown since its inception was -7.41%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFBYX and DBLSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFBYX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -57.22% | +49.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -0.72% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.60% | -0.72% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.41% | -4.71% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -45.00% | +44.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.16% | -31.51% | +30.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.16% | +0.31% |
Volatility
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison
American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund (TFBYX) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.42%. This indicates that TFBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFBYX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 0.42% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 0.89% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85% | 1.20% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.63% | 1.39% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 63.99% | -62.31% |
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFBYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFBYX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison
TFBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than DBLSX's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.55% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
TFBYX American Beacon TwentyFour Sustainable Short Term Bond Fund | 3.78% | 3.84% | 3.79% | 3.73% | 12.53% | 3.07% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFBYX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TFBYX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFBYX dropped -7.41% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.
DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFBYX and DBLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer