PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAZX vs. RPIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAZX achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly lower than RPIEX's 2.75% return.


TFAZX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.39%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*

RPIEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.00%
YTD
2.75%
6M
4.12%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TFAZX
TFA Tactical Income Fund
2.48%5.78%-1.56%-0.20%-9.93%5.85%2.99%4.44%
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
2.75%4.82%6.83%-4.51%3.08%0.08%9.42%-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAZX and RPIEX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

-0.21

The correlation between TFAZX and RPIEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (5 years) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAZX vs. RPIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAZX
TFAZX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TFAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIEX
RPIEX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RPIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAZXRPIEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.37

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

4.59

+3.98

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the RPIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAZX and RPIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAZXRPIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.14

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.38

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.58

-0.39

Drawdowns

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, which is greater than RPIEX's maximum drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAZX and RPIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAZXRPIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-9.59%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-3.64%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.15%

-3.64%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.73%

-9.59%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-0.26%

-5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-2.48%

-5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.08%

-0.12%

Volatility

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Volatility Comparison

TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund (RPIEX) at 0.86%. This indicates that TFAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAZXRPIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.86%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

3.87%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

4.36%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

4.92%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

4.19%

+2.77%

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAZX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIEX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAZX vs. RPIEX - Dividend Comparison

TFAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than RPIEX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RPIEX
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund
7.55%7.69%6.32%4.68%15.28%3.76%1.93%2.51%4.36%0.61%2.72%
TFAZX
TFA Tactical Income Fund
2.11%2.16%0.00%3.05%0.97%16.23%1.04%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAZX and RPIEX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAZX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to RPIEX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAZX dropped -17.69% vs RPIEX's -9.59%.

TFAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAZX and RPIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer