PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAZX vs. GMODX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) and GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAZX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than GMODX's 1.06% return.


TFAZX

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.16%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*

GMODX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.07%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TFAZX
TFA Tactical Income Fund
2.24%5.78%-1.56%-0.20%-9.93%5.85%2.99%4.44%
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
1.06%6.47%6.11%7.07%-2.09%2.83%3.34%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAZX and GMODX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.21

The correlation between TFAZX and GMODX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAZX vs. GMODX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAZX
TFAZX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TFAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GMODX
GMODX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
GMODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMODX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GMODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMODX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) and GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAZXGMODXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.78

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

7.30

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

30.63

-22.46

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the GMODX Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAZX and GMODX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAZXGMODXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

3.54

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

1.01

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

1.38

-1.20

Drawdowns

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.69%, which is greater than GMODX's maximum drawdown of -8.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAZX and GMODX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAZXGMODXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-8.79%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.84%

-0.65%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.15%

-4.97%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.73%

-5.79%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.07%

-0.12%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-0.70%

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.16%

+0.80%

Volatility

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Volatility Comparison

TFA Tactical Income Fund (TFAZX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to GMO Opportunistic Income Fund (GMODX) at 0.46%. This indicates that TFAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMODX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAZXGMODXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.46%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

0.91%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00%

1.35%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

3.82%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

3.04%

+3.92%

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAZX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GMODX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAZX vs. GMODX - Dividend Comparison

TFAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than GMODX's 5.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMODX
GMO Opportunistic Income Fund
5.01%4.99%5.28%6.17%5.44%2.10%4.15%5.69%4.35%2.66%2.55%1.71%
TFAZX
TFA Tactical Income Fund
2.12%2.16%0.00%3.05%0.97%16.23%1.04%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAZX and GMODX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAZX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to GMODX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAZX dropped -17.69% vs GMODX's -8.79%.

GMODX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAZX and GMODX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer