PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAQX vs. GTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAQX achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than GTAIX's 12.50% return.


TFAQX

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.43%
YTD
10.10%
6M
8.72%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*

GTAIX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.55%
YTD
12.50%
6M
12.88%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
10.10%11.41%22.12%23.25%-25.11%10.88%18.19%
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
12.50%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%9.25%14.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAQX and GTAIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.82

The correlation between TFAQX and GTAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAQX vs. GTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAQX
TFAQX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TFAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAQXGTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.54

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

5.05

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

21.43

-14.18

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the GTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAQX and GTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAQXGTAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.80

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.50

+0.10

Drawdowns

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAQX drawdown since its inception was -27.78%, which is greater than GTAIX's maximum drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAQX and GTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAQXGTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.78%

-24.25%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-4.51%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-11.89%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-19.43%

-8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.08%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.49%

-4.82%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

1.06%

+2.66%

Volatility

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Volatility Comparison

TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) at 2.68%. This indicates that TFAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAQXGTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

2.68%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

6.78%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

8.13%

+6.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

10.72%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

11.50%

+5.79%

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAQX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAQX vs. GTAIX - Dividend Comparison

TFAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than GTAIX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
4.90%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.23%10.16%0.00%0.03%5.06%20.52%4.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAQX and GTAIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAQX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to GTAIX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAQX dropped -27.78% vs GTAIX's -24.25%.

GTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAQX and GTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer