PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAIX vs. LFRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAIX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than LFRIX's 2.45% return.


TFAIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.86%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.54%

LFRIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.12%
6M
2.38%
YTD
2.45%
1Y
5.52%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
4.48%
ALL TIME*
4.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFAIX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I
0.79%6.61%9.06%10.85%-1.85%4.73%1.88%8.71%0.06%3.39%
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
2.45%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAIX and LFRIX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TFAIX and LFRIX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAIX vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TFAIX
TFAIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TFAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFAIXLFRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.88

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.79

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

14.02

-6.56

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the LFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAIX and LFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAIX drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, smaller than the maximum LFRIX drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAIX and LFRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAIXLFRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-27.90%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-1.55%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.34%

-2.59%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.88%

-6.23%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.25%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-1.93%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.42%

+0.05%

Volatility

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I (TFAIX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) have volatilities of 0.30% and 0.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAIXLFRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.31%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

1.91%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

2.44%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

2.87%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.91%

3.91%

0.00%

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAIX vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison

TFAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than LFRIX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.24%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
TFAIX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund Class I
5.78%7.14%8.30%7.12%4.13%3.98%4.12%4.97%5.01%4.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAIX and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.31%) compared to TFAIX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAIX dropped -19.93% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAIX and LFRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer