PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAFX vs. SRRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund (SRRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAFX achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than SRRIX's 8.54% return.


TFAFX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.95%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.44%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*

SRRIX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.33%
YTD
8.54%
6M
11.01%
1Y
36.86%
3Y*
32.68%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TFAFX
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund
8.11%11.54%20.19%19.64%-24.11%16.14%7.88%3.73%
SRRIX
Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund
8.54%29.63%33.14%44.73%5.10%-6.47%4.30%-3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAFX and SRRIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAFX vs. SRRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAFX
TFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SRRIX
SRRIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SRRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SRRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund (SRRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAFXSRRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-45.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

30.11

-28.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

67.15

-64.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

703.99

-694.61

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the SRRIX Sharpe Ratio of 14.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAFX and SRRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAFXSRRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

14.40

-12.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.58

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.88

-0.31

Drawdowns

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAFX drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, smaller than the maximum SRRIX drawdown of -27.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAFX and SRRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAFXSRRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-27.22%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-0.55%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-17.26%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-17.26%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-9.90%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.05%

+2.42%

Volatility

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Volatility Comparison

Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund (SRRIX) at 0.31%. This indicates that TFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAFXSRRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

0.31%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

0.89%

+8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

2.58%

+9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

13.95%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

11.01%

+3.39%

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is lower than SRRIX's 2.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAFX vs. SRRIX - Dividend Comparison

TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRRIX
Stone Ridge Reinsurance Risk Premium Interval Fund
18.55%20.14%21.58%20.02%0.00%0.00%0.38%1.06%2.32%0.10%6.16%8.41%
TFAFX
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%3.71%12.30%4.64%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAFX and SRRIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAFX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to SRRIX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAFX dropped -25.67% vs SRRIX's -27.22%.

SRRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.40 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAFX and SRRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer