PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFAFX vs. SHRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFAFX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than SHRIX's 1.46% return.


TFAFX

1D
0.14%
1M
4.49%
YTD
7.80%
6M
7.38%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

SHRIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.18%
1Y
12.44%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TFAFX
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund
7.80%11.54%20.19%19.64%-24.11%16.14%7.88%3.73%
SHRIX
Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I
1.46%10.70%16.73%21.07%-3.37%1.88%6.86%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TFAFX and SHRIX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFAFX vs. SHRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFAFX
TFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRIX
SHRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SHRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TFAFXSHRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

5.33

-3.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

6.16

-3.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

4.93

-3.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

6.71

-4.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.15

23.55

-13.40

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the SHRIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFAFX and SHRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFAFXSHRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

5.33

-3.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.45

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.93

-0.37

Drawdowns

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFAFX drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than SHRIX's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAFX and SHRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFAFXSHRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-14.34%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-1.87%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-6.91%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.67%

-12.69%

-12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-2.06%

-5.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.53%

+1.94%

Volatility

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Volatility Comparison

Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I (SHRIX) at 0.25%. This indicates that TFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFAFXSHRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

0.25%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

2.03%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

2.37%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

6.26%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

6.29%

+8.12%

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFAFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SHRIX's 1.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFAFX vs. SHRIX - Dividend Comparison

TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHRIX
Stone Ridge High Yield Reinsurance Risk Premium Fund Class I
10.77%10.92%14.34%12.34%3.89%4.61%6.34%5.06%5.09%0.35%
TFAFX
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%3.71%12.30%4.64%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFAFX and SHRIX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAFX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to SHRIX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFAFX dropped -25.67% vs SHRIX's -14.34%.

SHRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.33 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFAFX and SHRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer