TFAFX vs. QSPRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX).
TFAFX is managed by Tactical Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019. QSPRX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Sep 2, 2014.
Performance
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | -3.78% | 11.54% | 20.19% | 19.64% | -24.11% | 16.14% | 7.88% | 3.73% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 9.87% | 14.94% | 21.60% | 12.50% | 30.90% | 25.14% | -21.91% | -5.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFAFX achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 9.87% return.
TFAFX
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -3.11%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- —
QSPRX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFAFX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TFAFX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank
TFAFX
QSPRX
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TFAFX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 1.39 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 1.89 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.74 | -0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 5.27 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TFAFX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 1.39 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.19 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between TFAFX and QSPRX is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison
TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 3.71% | 12.30% | 4.64% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 2.39% | 2.63% | 6.99% | 23.75% | 22.67% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 7.15% | 1.74% | 5.87% |
Drawdowns
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFAFX drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, smaller than the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFAFX and QSPRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFAFX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -41.22% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | -7.75% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.67% | -17.17% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.53% | -0.21% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -10.21% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.70% | +0.47% |
Volatility
TFAFX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) at 2.49%. This indicates that TFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TFAFX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 2.49% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 6.51% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 10.11% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 16.00% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 12.80% | +1.70% |