TEXN vs. CSHP
TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEXN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Texas Equity Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. TEXN is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
TEXN vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEXN achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.87% return.
TEXN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 20.57%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 20.57% | 8.33% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.87% | 2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEXN and CSHP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEXN vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
TEXN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSHP
TEXN vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEXN | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 6.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 66.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 400.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEXN vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEXN drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEXN and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEXN | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -0.08% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | 0.00% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -0.00% | -1.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
TEXN vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEXN | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 0.35% | +14.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 0.41% | +14.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 0.41% | +14.06% |
TEXN vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TEXN and CSHP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TEXN vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.40% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEXN and CSHP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEXN and CSHP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.40% for TEXN.
TEXN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond.
Find the right allocation for TEXN and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer