TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO
TEQT.TO (TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio) and PZW.TO (Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF) are both Global Equities funds - TEQT.TO tracks the 25% Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (C$, Net Total Return); 55% Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return); 20% Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex. North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return) while PZW.TO tracks the 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TEQT.TO returned 29.36% vs 34.57% for PZW.TO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEQT.TO achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly lower than PZW.TO's 16.48% return.
TEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZW.TO
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 6M
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 11.89% | 27.28% |
PZW.TO Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF | 16.48% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEQT.TO and PZW.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TEQT.TO
PZW.TO
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEQT.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.48 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 4.07 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.66 | 14.54 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.62%, smaller than the maximum PZW.TO drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQT.TO and PZW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEQT.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -32.45% | +24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -8.50% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | 0.00% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -5.73% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.38% | -0.50% |
Volatility
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Volatility Comparison
TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio (TEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) at 3.07%. This indicates that TEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEQT.TO | PZW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.07% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.40% | 10.46% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 14.19% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 14.66% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.38% | 15.94% | -3.56% |
Dividends
TEQT.TO vs. PZW.TO - Dividend Comparison
TEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than PZW.TO's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZW.TO Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF | 1.67% | 1.97% | 2.12% | 3.23% | 1.90% | 1.93% | 1.52% | 2.26% | 1.78% | 1.57% | 1.09% | 0.96% |
TEQT.TO TD All-Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.31% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEQT.TO and PZW.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEQT.TO tracks 25% Solactive Canada Broad Market Index (C$, Net Total Return); 55% Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return); 20% Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex. North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (C$, Net Total Return), while PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for TEQT.TO and PZW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer