PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQLX vs. SIEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TEQLX having a 30.13% return and SIEMX slightly lower at 29.32%. Over the past 10 years, TEQLX has outperformed SIEMX with an annualized return of 10.64%, while SIEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.09% annualized return.


TEQLX

1D
1.22%
1M
10.66%
YTD
30.13%
6M
33.10%
1Y
59.14%
3Y*
24.95%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
10.64%

SIEMX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.93%
YTD
29.32%
6M
32.48%
1Y
58.10%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
30.13%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-14.60%37.47%
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
29.32%35.90%4.31%9.81%-21.51%-1.85%17.03%19.76%-18.67%37.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQLX and SIEMX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2010

0.94

The correlation between TEQLX and SIEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEQLX vs. SIEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SIEMX
SIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEQLXSIEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.66

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

4.53

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.79

17.66

+0.13

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is comparable to the SIEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQLX and SIEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEQLXSIEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

3.49

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.58

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.29

+0.07

Drawdowns

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQLX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum SIEMX drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQLX and SIEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQLXSIEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-65.22%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-13.59%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-16.41%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.05%

-37.68%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-40.76%

+1.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.61%

-21.45%

+6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.42%

-0.07%

Volatility

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) at 7.34%. This indicates that TEQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEQLXSIEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

7.34%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

14.85%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

17.66%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.67%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

17.50%

+0.18%

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEMX's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEQLX vs. SIEMX - Dividend Comparison

TEQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SIEMX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.33%4.30%3.20%1.58%2.08%9.55%0.53%1.09%0.63%1.26%0.80%0.81%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.17%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TEQLX and SIEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEQLX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to SIEMX (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQLX dropped -39.33% vs SIEMX's -65.22%.

SIEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 3.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEQLX and SIEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer