PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQLX vs. NMMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQLX achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly lower than NMMEX's 24.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEQLX having a 9.08% annualized return and NMMEX not far ahead at 9.39%.


TEQLX

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.35%
6M
13.91%
YTD
20.73%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
9.08%

NMMEX

1D
0.62%
1M
-5.21%
6M
15.14%
YTD
24.18%
1Y
44.71%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
20.73%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-14.60%37.47%
NMMEX
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund
24.18%34.16%6.63%12.12%-22.33%-1.22%18.85%16.26%-14.90%35.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQLX and NMMEX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2010

0.95

The correlation between TEQLX and NMMEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEQLX vs. NMMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NMMEX
NMMEX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NMMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NMMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEQLXNMMEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.23

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

11.47

-1.69

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the NMMEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQLX and NMMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQLX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum NMMEX drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQLX and NMMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQLXNMMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-44.64%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-14.25%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-16.13%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.64%

-44.64%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

-44.64%

+5.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-6.78%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-14.95%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.98%

-0.11%

Volatility

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) at 9.12%. This indicates that TEQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEQLXNMMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

9.12%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.13%

19.23%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

20.87%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

24.16%

-6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.66%

-3.65%

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NMMEX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Dividend Comparison

TEQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than NMMEX's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMMEX
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund
1.55%1.93%0.80%1.82%0.89%29.82%6.99%8.34%0.99%0.00%1.90%4.46%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.34%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEQLX and NMMEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEQLX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to NMMEX (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQLX dropped -39.33% vs NMMEX's -44.64%.

NMMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEQLX and NMMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer