TEQLX vs. NMMEX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX).
TEQLX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 30, 2010. NMMEX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Nov 18, 2008.
Performance
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 0.14% | 34.10% | 6.71% | 9.23% | -20.22% | -3.07% | 17.67% | 18.59% | -14.60% | 37.47% |
NMMEX Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund | 2.57% | 34.16% | 6.63% | 12.12% | -22.33% | -1.22% | 18.85% | 16.26% | -14.90% | 35.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEQLX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than NMMEX's 2.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEQLX having a 7.64% annualized return and NMMEX not far ahead at 7.95%.
TEQLX
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -12.40%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
NMMEX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -13.81%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 35.05%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEQLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NMMEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEQLX vs. NMMEX — Risk / Return Rank
TEQLX
NMMEX
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEQLX | NMMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.95 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.52 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.26 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 8.79 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEQLX | NMMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.95 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.19 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEQLX and NMMEX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Dividend Comparison
TEQLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than NMMEX's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEQLX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund | 2.82% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 3.08% | 2.51% | 2.27% | 2.04% | 2.77% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.40% |
NMMEX Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund | 1.88% | 1.93% | 0.80% | 1.82% | 0.89% | 29.82% | 6.99% | 8.34% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 1.90% | 4.46% |
Drawdowns
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEQLX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum NMMEX drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQLX and NMMEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEQLX | NMMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -44.64% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -14.25% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -44.64% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -44.64% | +5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.32% | -14.25% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.74% | -15.14% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.66% | -0.21% |
Volatility
TEQLX vs. NMMEX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) at 8.13%. This indicates that TEQLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEQLX | NMMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 8.13% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.30% | 12.93% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 17.85% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 23.26% | -6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 21.32% | -3.88% |