TEQI vs. LSVD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TEQI (T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TEQI returned 20.30% vs 43.26% for LSVD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TEQI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.

Performance

TEQI vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.

TEQI

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: —

LSVD

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEQI vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF	9.71%	13.36%	1.14%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	17.67%	22.29%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQI and LSVD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.74

The correlation between TEQI and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEQI vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TEQI	LSVD
Financial Services	20.3%	12.5%
Healthcare	12.9%	11.8%
Industrials	12.4%	4.8%
Technology	12.3%	34.8%
Energy	11.0%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	3.2%
Utilities	6.8%	0.8%
Communication Services	6.6%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	12.0%
Real Estate	3.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.5%

Return for Risk

TEQI vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQI

TEQI Risk / Return Rank: 57
TEQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TEQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TEQI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TEQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TEQI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 92
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQI vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEQI	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	3.41	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	4.64	-1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.61	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	5.38	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	24.69	-14.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEQI vs. LSVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the LSVD Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQI and LSVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEQI	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	3.41	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	1.66	-0.68

Drawdowns

TEQI vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and LSVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEQI	LSVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	-19.30%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-8.07%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.53%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-2.47%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.76%	+0.26%

Volatility

TEQI vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 2.68%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEQI	LSVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	3.36%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	9.52%	-1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	12.76%	-2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	17.45%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	17.45%	-2.33%

TEQI vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TEQI vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TEQI T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF	1.55%	1.71%	1.86%	2.12%	2.32%	3.03%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TEQI and LSVD in my portfolio?

TEQI and LSVD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TEQI or LSVD?

LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to TEQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQI dropped -17.82% vs LSVD's -19.30%.

Which ETF is better, TEQI or LSVD?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 20.30% for TEQI. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TEQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TEQI or LSVD?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 20.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TEQI or LSVD?

LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for TEQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TEQI or LSVD?

TEQI has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between TEQI and LSVD?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for TEQI and 0.40% for LSVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.