PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQI vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TEQI vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEQI vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
0.38%13.36%13.14%9.64%-3.33%26.25%18.07%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
-1.50%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%15.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQI achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's -1.50% return.


TEQI

1D
0.41%
1M
-4.48%
YTD
0.38%
6M
3.94%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
0.38%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TEQI vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TEQI vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEQI
TEQI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TEQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEQI vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEQIFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.00

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

1.44

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.23

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.31

5.34

-2.03

TEQI vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQI and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEQIFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.00

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.87

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.74

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between TEQI and FDVV is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TEQI vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

TEQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than FDVV's 2.99% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TEQI
T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF
1.69%1.71%1.86%2.12%2.32%3.03%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.99%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Drawdowns

TEQI vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQI drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQI and FDVV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQIFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.82%

-40.25%

+22.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-12.34%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

-20.18%

+2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

-6.78%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-3.85%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.84%

+0.13%

Volatility

TEQI vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income ETF (TEQI) is 3.79%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that TEQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEQIFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

4.47%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

7.68%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

15.32%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.74%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

17.08%

-1.84%