PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEQAX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEQAX achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 8.14% return.


TEQAX

1D
2.72%
1M
0.44%
6M
6.21%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.66%
ALL TIME*
9.65%

GSIMX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.06%
6M
4.43%
YTD
8.14%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
12.58%29.86%8.94%23.45%-17.07%11.86%14.44%23.18%-9.72%25.74%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
8.14%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TEQAX and GSIMX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between TEQAX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEQAX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEQAX
TEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEQAXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.02

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

5.51

+2.05

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEQAX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEQAX drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEQAX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEQAXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.14%

-28.84%

-32.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-7.81%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-10.32%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.95%

-25.37%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-2.17%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-4.80%

-12.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.85%

+0.28%

Volatility

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.73%. This indicates that TEQAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEQAXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

2.73%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.56%

8.18%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

9.85%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

14.25%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

15.61%

+2.64%

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEQAX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEQAX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

TEQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than GSIMX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
3.91%4.40%3.51%1.46%7.21%12.19%0.33%3.80%10.50%13.02%0.55%51.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEQAX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEQAX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to GSIMX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEQAX dropped -61.14% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEQAX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer