TEPAX vs. RGAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio (TEPAX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX).
TEPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 17, 2012. RGAGX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPAX American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio | -0.02% | 4.36% | 2.14% | 3.63% | -4.36% | -0.03% | 3.52% | 4.14% | 0.90% | 2.43% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | -7.99% | 20.08% | 28.41% | 37.66% | -30.53% | 19.67% | 38.30% | 29.22% | -2.88% | 26.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEPAX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's -7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TEPAX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.
TEPAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
RGAGX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -7.99%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEPAX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEPAX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank
TEPAX
RGAGX
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio (TEPAX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEPAX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 0.86 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.37 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.20 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.29 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 4.90 | +2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEPAX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 0.86 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.46 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEPAX and RGAGX is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison
TEPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than RGAGX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEPAX American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio | 2.40% | 2.39% | 2.44% | 1.96% | 1.11% | 0.87% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.36% |
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 | 11.95% | 10.99% | 9.29% | 7.70% | 4.44% | 8.49% | 4.57% | 7.93% | 12.36% | 7.34% | 6.95% | 9.22% |
Drawdowns
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEPAX drawdown since its inception was -7.13%, smaller than the maximum RGAGX drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEPAX and RGAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEPAX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -36.19% | +29.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.07% | -13.71% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.12% | -36.19% | +29.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.13% | -36.19% | +29.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -10.64% | +9.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -5.53% | +4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 3.62% | -3.09% |
Volatility
TEPAX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio (TEPAX) is 0.62%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that TEPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEPAX | RGAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 6.74% | -6.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.99% | 12.12% | -11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 21.00% | -18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.93% | 20.23% | -18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 19.64% | -17.58% |