TEND vs. PAPR
TEND (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. TEND is actively managed, while PAPR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAPR.
Performance
TEND vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEND achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.36% return.
TEND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
TEND vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF | 5.70% | 1.62% |
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 7.36% | 1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEND and PAPR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEND vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank
TEND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PAPR
TEND vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF (TEND) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TEND | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.93 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 58.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TEND vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEND drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum PAPR drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEND and PAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEND | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -15.31% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.54% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -1.56% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility
TEND vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEND | PAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.32% | 3.42% | +4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 8.22% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.32% | 9.42% | -1.10% |
TEND vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEND vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison
TEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while PAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.07% |
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEND and PAPR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PAPR.
TEND has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for PAPR.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TEND and 0.79% for PAPR.
Find the right allocation for TEND and PAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer