TEND vs. DYNF
TEND (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEND is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TEND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
TEND vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEND achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.55% return.
TEND
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- —
TEND vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF | 6.91% | 1.72% |
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.55% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEND and DYNF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEND vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
TEND
DYNF
TEND vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF (TEND) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEND | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 0.83 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
TEND vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEND drawdown since its inception was -5.92%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEND and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEND | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -34.72% | +28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.57% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -5.98% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.78% | — |
Volatility
TEND vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEND | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.08% | 12.44% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 17.50% | -9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 19.90% | -11.82% |
TEND vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEND vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
TEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than DYNF's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, TEND and DYNF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DYNF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DYNF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TEND.
DYNF has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.13% for TEND.
TEND is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TEND and 0.30% for DYNF.
Find the right allocation for TEND and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer