TEMZX vs. GLLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).
TEMZX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Oct 1, 2006. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.
Performance
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMZX Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | -2.70% | 10.91% | 7.92% | 13.57% | -18.99% | 23.64% | 9.92% | 5.80% | -14.72% | 31.60% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 5.47% | 34.81% | 0.73% | 21.35% | -23.04% | 36.50% | 15.93% | 23.64% | -11.50% | 23.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMZX achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TEMZX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 5.96%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.
TEMZX
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
GLLSX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 48.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMZX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEMZX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank
TEMZX
GLLSX
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMZX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 2.46 | -1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 3.02 | -1.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.46 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 3.15 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 13.47 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMZX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.46 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.71 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.67 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.55 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMZX and GLLSX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison
TEMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEMZX Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund | 1.42% | 1.39% | 0.52% | 3.14% | 8.03% | 10.93% | 2.81% | 1.82% | 2.86% | 0.12% | 2.02% | 0.56% |
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 1.78% | 1.88% | 0.74% | 0.77% | 29.32% | 22.85% | 0.00% | 3.38% | 9.47% | 8.40% | 1.09% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMZX drawdown since its inception was -69.98%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMZX and GLLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMZX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.98% | -32.59% | -37.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.50% | -14.39% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.26% | -30.02% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.59% | -32.59% | -16.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -14.39% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -7.99% | -4.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 3.36% | -0.57% |
Volatility
TEMZX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (TEMZX) is 5.80%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that TEMZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEMZX | GLLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 10.78% | -4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 15.60% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 19.51% | -7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 17.21% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 17.34% | -3.17% |