TEMT vs. IBID
TEMT (Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TEMT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. TEMT is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, TEMT returned -60.08% vs 4.68% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. TEMT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
TEMT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEMT achieves a -38.81% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.40% return.
TEMT
- 1D
- 18.89%
- 1M
- -11.94%
- YTD
- -38.81%
- 6M
- -64.28%
- 1Y
- -60.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEMT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | -38.81% | -51.84% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.40% | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TEMT and IBID is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TEMT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
TEMT
IBID
TEMT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEMT | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.90 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 12.89 | -13.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 39.18 | -40.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEMT | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 3.78 | -4.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 2.55 | -3.05 |
Drawdowns
TEMT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEMT drawdown since its inception was -87.10%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEMT and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEMT | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.10% | -1.28% | -85.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.10% | -0.36% | -86.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.11% | -0.05% | -82.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.01% | -0.22% | -48.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.40% | 0.12% | +57.28% |
Volatility
TEMT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) has a higher volatility of 38.27% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.33%. This indicates that TEMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TEMT | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.27% | 0.33% | +37.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.77% | 0.80% | +85.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.00% | 1.24% | +125.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 135.17% | 2.25% | +132.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 135.17% | 2.25% | +132.92% |
TEMT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEMT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TEMT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
TEMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.91%, more than IBID's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.67% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF | 54.91% | 33.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TEMT and IBID have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEMT has higher volatility (38.27%) compared to IBID (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEMT dropped -87.10% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 4.68% vs -60.08% for TEMT. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 4.68% return vs -60.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for TEMT.
TEMT has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 3.67% for IBID.
TEMT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for TEMT and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TEMT and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer