PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEMP vs. JCPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEMP vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF (TEMP) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TEMP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JCPB

1D
0.13%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.84%
1Y
5.60%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEMP vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TEMP
JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF
0.00%18.26%8.50%10.19%-21.11%1.71%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.71%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TEMP and JCPB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.27

The correlation between TEMP and JCPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEMP vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEMP
JCPB

Industrials

58.3%
0.6%

Utilities

18.8%
1.9%

Technology

13.7%
9.1%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

2.1%
13.9%

Communication Services

-

16.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Energy

-

1.6%

Healthcare

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

4.6%

Industrials

TEMP
58.3%
JCPB
0.6%

Utilities

TEMP
18.8%
JCPB
1.9%

Technology

TEMP
13.7%
JCPB
9.1%

Basic Materials

TEMP
3.7%
JCPB
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

TEMP
3.5%
JCPB
1.4%

Financial Services

TEMP
2.1%
JCPB
13.9%

Communication Services

TEMP

-

JCPB
16.3%

Consumer Defensive

TEMP

-

JCPB
0.5%

Energy

TEMP

-

JCPB
1.6%

Healthcare

TEMP

-

JCPB
3.9%

Real Estate

TEMP

-

JCPB
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEMP vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEMP

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEMP vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF (TEMP) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TEMP vs. JCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEMPJCPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

Drawdowns

TEMP vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEMPJCPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

Volatility

TEMP vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEMPJCPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

TEMP vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEMP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEMP vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison

TEMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.92%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%
TEMP
JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF
0.00%0.00%1.53%1.11%1.07%0.06%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEMP and JCPB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JCPB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JCPB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TEMP.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.00% for TEMP.

TEMP is categorized as Global Equities, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TEMP and 0.38% for JCPB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEMP and JCPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer