PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEI vs. DBLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TEI vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (TEI) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TEI vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEI
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
-4.77%45.41%11.77%3.78%-15.49%3.48%-9.06%3.51%-6.20%8.09%
DBLLX
DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
0.02%7.86%7.20%7.00%-5.05%-0.21%3.53%8.57%-0.04%4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEI achieves a -4.77% return, which is significantly lower than DBLLX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TEI has outperformed DBLLX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while DBLLX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.


TEI

1D
1.86%
1M
-12.22%
YTD
-4.77%
6M
6.22%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
4.25%

DBLLX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
0.02%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.32%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TEI vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

TEI vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEI
TEI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLLX
DBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEI vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (TEI) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEIDBLLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

3.75

-2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

5.19

-2.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.29

-0.97

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

4.05

-2.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.78

21.50

-13.72

TEI vs. DBLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the DBLLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEI and DBLLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEIDBLLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.75

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

1.72

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

1.91

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.68

-1.28

Correlation

The correlation between TEI and DBLLX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TEI vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison

TEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than DBLLX's 5.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TEI
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
14.56%13.57%11.11%11.09%11.88%10.44%7.34%8.51%9.27%5.56%7.33%8.24%
DBLLX
DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
5.01%5.27%4.70%3.74%2.41%2.15%2.61%4.93%2.87%3.00%3.19%3.77%

Drawdowns

TEI vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEI drawdown since its inception was -51.50%, which is greater than DBLLX's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEI and DBLLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TEIDBLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.50%

-10.13%

-41.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-1.35%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

-10.13%

-29.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-10.13%

-33.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.75%

-0.92%

-11.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.79%

-1.31%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

0.25%

+3.36%

Volatility

TEI vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (TEI) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) at 0.35%. This indicates that TEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TEIDBLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

0.35%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

0.75%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

1.43%

+15.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

1.93%

+17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

1.90%

+15.58%