TEDNX vs. EDF
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF).
TEDNX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 25, 2014. EDF is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 23, 2010.
Performance
TEDNX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TEDNX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEDNX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund | -2.96% | 13.84% | 8.61% | 12.56% | -14.41% | -0.86% | 6.13% | 17.49% | -5.95% | 12.07% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 2.58% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TEDNX achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 2.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEDNX having a 4.96% annualized return and EDF not far ahead at 5.06%.
TEDNX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
EDF
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 4.70%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TEDNX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TEDNX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TEDNX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank
TEDNX
EDF
TEDNX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TEDNX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 0.80 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.11 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.16 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 0.88 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 3.89 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TEDNX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.80 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.11 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.17 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.10 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between TEDNX and EDF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TEDNX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison
TEDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than EDF's 14.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEDNX TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 4.82% | 5.80% | 6.58% | 5.03% | 6.15% | 4.81% | 4.27% | 5.28% | 5.58% | 5.93% | 5.56% | 5.18% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 14.63% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
Drawdowns
TEDNX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TEDNX drawdown since its inception was -25.65%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDNX and EDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TEDNX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -64.23% | +38.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.36% | -13.91% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | -53.09% | +27.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.65% | -64.23% | +38.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.04% | -15.87% | +10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -21.61% | +16.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 3.20% | -2.12% |
Volatility
TEDNX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Debt Fund (TEDNX) is 2.48%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that TEDNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TEDNX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 6.38% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 10.45% | -7.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 18.19% | -13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 25.88% | -20.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 30.66% | -24.61% |