PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDMX vs. GTDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 44.70% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 49.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has outperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.46% annualized return.


TEDMX

1D
0.90%
1M
17.40%
YTD
44.70%
6M
48.60%
1Y
85.58%
3Y*
33.21%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.61%

GTDDX

1D
1.53%
1M
21.98%
YTD
49.96%
6M
55.26%
1Y
78.97%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
44.70%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
49.96%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and GTDDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 1994

0.81

The correlation between TEDMX and GTDDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEDMXGTDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.74

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.78

5.47

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.57

21.76

+1.82

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.22, which is comparable to the GTDDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and GTDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEDMXGTDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22

4.11

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.55

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.35

+0.07

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, roughly equal to the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and GTDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDMXGTDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.97%

-62.89%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-14.49%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-16.08%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.15%

-37.56%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-39.58%

-4.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.45%

-18.75%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

3.63%

-0.01%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a higher volatility of 8.86% compared to Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) at 7.89%. This indicates that TEDMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDMXGTDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.86%

7.89%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.58%

16.72%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

19.29%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.52%

16.38%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

16.91%

+2.21%

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDMX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than GTDDX's 14.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
14.09%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.83%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TEDMX and GTDDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEDMX has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to GTDDX (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 4.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDMX and GTDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer