PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEDMX vs. DEMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEDMX achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 77.19% return. Over the past 10 years, TEDMX has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 11.43%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.41% annualized return.


TEDMX

1D
2.40%
1M
-1.04%
6M
15.12%
YTD
28.97%
1Y
54.46%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.43%
ALL TIME*
7.36%

DEMAX

1D
5.25%
1M
-13.94%
6M
47.11%
YTD
77.19%
1Y
168.85%
3Y*
53.69%
5Y*
24.13%
10Y*
18.41%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
28.97%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
77.19%86.33%6.25%17.34%-28.85%-2.32%25.54%24.05%-17.32%41.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TEDMX and DEMAX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1996

0.85

The correlation between TEDMX and DEMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEDMX vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMAX
DEMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DEMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEDMXDEMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

4.39

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

17.93

-7.86

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEDMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the DEMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEDMX and DEMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEDMX drawdown since its inception was -64.97%, roughly equal to the maximum DEMAX drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEDMX and DEMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEDMXDEMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.97%

-63.23%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.36%

-36.53%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-36.53%

+20.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.73%

-38.58%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.36%

-46.51%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.87%

-27.64%

+16.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.40%

-18.72%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

8.91%

-3.77%

Volatility

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) is 10.50%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 25.87%. This indicates that TEDMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEDMXDEMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

25.87%

-15.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.00%

49.73%

-25.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.97%

53.13%

-27.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.69%

30.18%

-9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

25.84%

-6.13%

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEDMX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEDMX vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison

TEDMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than DEMAX's 10.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMAX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A
10.74%19.03%1.74%2.76%1.60%3.16%0.56%0.57%0.34%1.59%0.70%0.03%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
2.05%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEDMX and DEMAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMAX has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to TEDMX (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEDMX dropped -64.97% vs DEMAX's -63.23%.

DEMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEDMX and DEMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer