PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECTP vs. AGNCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TECTP achieves a -3.86% return, which is significantly lower than AGNCN's 4.16% return.


TECTP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-3.86%
6M
-8.10%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*

AGNCN

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
4.16%
6M
5.60%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TECTP
Tectonic Financial, Inc.
-3.86%14.18%14.35%7.22%6.05%35.12%-9.66%8.39%
AGNCN
AGNC Investment Corp.
4.16%7.77%15.21%9.13%6.33%7.91%6.01%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TECTP and AGNCN is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2019

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TECTP:

$68.70M

AGNCN:

$28.87B

EPS

TECTP:

$0.48

AGNCN:

$1.33

PE Ratio

TECTP:

20.99

AGNCN:

19.32

PEG Ratio

TECTP:

2.69

AGNCN:

0.05

PS Ratio

TECTP:

0.76

AGNCN:

11.86

PB Ratio

TECTP:

0.58

AGNCN:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

TECTP:

$90.05M

AGNCN:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TECTP:

$61.31M

AGNCN:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

TECTP:

-$15.80M

AGNCN:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TECTP vs. AGNCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECTP
TECTP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TECTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECTP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TECTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECTP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNCN
AGNCN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AGNCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNCN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNCN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECTPAGNCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

3.90

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

15.04

-14.65

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the AGNCN Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECTP and AGNCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECTPAGNCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

2.06

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.98

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.39

+0.01

Drawdowns

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECTP drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, smaller than the maximum AGNCN drawdown of -53.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECTP and AGNCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECTPAGNCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.27%

-53.34%

+22.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.52%

-2.67%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.52%

-7.17%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-13.62%

-6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.41%

-0.69%

-9.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-2.24%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

0.69%

+6.21%

Volatility

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP) is 0.00%, while AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNCN) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that TECTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGNCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECTPAGNCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.05%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

3.19%

+3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

5.07%

+8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

9.51%

+5.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.12%

22.94%

+1.18%

Dividends

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Dividend Comparison

TECTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, less than AGNCN's 9.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AGNCN
AGNC Investment Corp.
9.27%9.60%10.37%10.57%7.47%6.81%6.87%6.74%6.92%2.70%
TECTP
Tectonic Financial, Inc.
8.56%10.81%10.32%8.91%8.74%8.51%10.51%4.31%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TECTP vs. AGNCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tectonic Financial, Inc. and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B20222023202420252026
20.40M
0
(TECTP) Total Revenue
(AGNCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TECTP and AGNCN have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGNCN has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to TECTP (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECTP dropped -31.27% vs AGNCN's -53.34%.

AGNCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TECTP and AGNCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer