PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TECH.TO
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD
-9.64%18.22%40.26%11.03%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
-9.31%30.06%35.30%15.39%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TECH.TO having a -9.64% return and QQQT.TO slightly higher at -9.31%.


TECH.TO

1D
4.00%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-9.64%
6M
-9.79%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
27.42%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT.TO

1D
4.95%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-9.31%
6M
-5.74%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TECH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TECH.TO
TECH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECH.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

1.19

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.87

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.98

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

7.25

-3.92

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TECH.TO and QQQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECH.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.19

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.96

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between TECH.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

TECH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than QQQT.TO's 0.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
TECH.TO
Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD
0.12%0.12%0.14%0.20%0.35%0.17%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.25%0.30%5.63%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TECH.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.92%, which is greater than QQQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECH.TO and QQQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TECH.TOQQQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.92%

-30.32%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.59%

-17.37%

+0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.06%

-13.27%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-4.98%

-7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

4.75%

+0.34%

Volatility

TECH.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) is 6.82%, while Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that TECH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TECH.TOQQQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

9.11%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

17.31%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

29.50%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.64%

26.40%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.64%

26.40%

+0.24%