PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEC vs. SIFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEC vs. SIFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEC achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly higher than SIFI's 1.12% return.


TEC

1D
-1.25%
1M
11.87%
YTD
20.38%
6M
18.30%
1Y
41.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SIFI

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.44%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEC vs. SIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEC and SIFI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

0.41

TEC vs. SIFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEC
SIFI

Technology

69.5%
15.7%

Communication Services

13.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
11.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.9%

Utilities

1.5%
1.9%

Financial Services

1.1%
4.4%

Industrials

1.0%
16.2%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

7.9%

Real Estate

-

4.8%

Technology

TEC
69.5%
SIFI
15.7%

Communication Services

TEC
13.5%
SIFI
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TEC
9.3%
SIFI
11.8%

Healthcare

TEC
4.2%
SIFI
3.9%

Utilities

TEC
1.5%
SIFI
1.9%

Financial Services

TEC
1.1%
SIFI
4.4%

Industrials

TEC
1.0%
SIFI
16.2%

Basic Materials

TEC

-

SIFI
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

TEC

-

SIFI
2.9%

Energy

TEC

-

SIFI
7.9%

Real Estate

TEC

-

SIFI
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEC vs. SIFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEC
TEC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFI
SIFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SIFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEC vs. SIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECSIFIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

2.16

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

3.31

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.70

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.40

11.05

-3.65

TEC vs. SIFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the SIFI Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEC and SIFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECSIFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.16

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.08

0.47

+2.61

Drawdowns

TEC vs. SIFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, which is greater than SIFI's maximum drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and SIFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECSIFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-14.68%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-2.71%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.20%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-4.82%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

0.66%

+4.96%

Volatility

TEC vs. SIFI - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) at 1.02%. This indicates that TEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECSIFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

1.02%

+4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

2.47%

+13.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

3.39%

+16.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.95%

4.93%

+16.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

4.93%

+16.02%

TEC vs. SIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEC vs. SIFI - Dividend Comparison

TEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
SIFI
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
6.45%6.57%5.87%5.71%3.88%0.86%
TEC
Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEC and SIFI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEC has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to SIFI (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEC dropped -17.50% vs SIFI's -14.68%.

On 1-year performance, TEC leads with 41.52% vs 7.30% for SIFI. On fees, SIFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TEC has performed better with a 41.52% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TEC.

SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.00% for TEC.

TEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIFI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.50% for SIFI.

SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEC and SIFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer