PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEC vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEC vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEC achieves a 20.38% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.


TEC

1D
-1.25%
1M
11.87%
YTD
20.38%
6M
18.30%
1Y
41.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIS

1D
0.72%
1M
35.87%
YTD
118.61%
6M
122.65%
1Y
226.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEC vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TEC and AIS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2025

0.80

The correlation between TEC and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

TEC vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEC
AIS

Technology

69.5%
84.6%

Communication Services

13.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Utilities

1.5%
3.2%

Financial Services

1.1%
-0.0%

Industrials

1.0%
8.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TEC
69.5%
AIS
84.6%

Communication Services

TEC
13.5%
AIS

-

Consumer Cyclical

TEC
9.3%
AIS

-

Healthcare

TEC
4.2%
AIS

-

Utilities

TEC
1.5%
AIS
3.2%

Financial Services

TEC
1.1%
AIS
-0.0%

Industrials

TEC
1.0%
AIS
8.9%

Basic Materials

TEC

-

AIS

-

Consumer Defensive

TEC

-

AIS

-

Energy

TEC

-

AIS

-

Real Estate

TEC

-

AIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEC vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEC
TEC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEC vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TECAISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.08

6.34

-4.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.71

5.78

-3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.80

-0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

14.41

-12.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.40

47.43

-40.03

TEC vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEC and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TECAISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

6.34

-4.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.08

3.24

-0.16

Drawdowns

TEC vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC and AIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TECAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-32.78%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.50%

-15.84%

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-5.45%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

4.80%

+0.82%

Volatility

TEC vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) is 5.28%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that TEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TECAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

16.12%

-10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

29.95%

-14.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

36.00%

-15.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.95%

38.04%

-17.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

38.04%

-17.09%

TEC vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEC vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEC nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TEC and AIS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIS has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to TEC (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEC dropped -17.50% vs AIS's -32.78%.

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 226.72% vs 41.52% for TEC. On fees, TEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 226.72% return vs 41.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

TEC and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TEC and 0.75% for AIS.

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEC and AIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer