PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEC.TO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.01% return.


TEC.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.30%
YTD
17.96%
6M
15.29%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
20.41%
10Y*

ENCC.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
2.37%
YTD
29.01%
6M
25.71%
1Y
41.57%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
17.96%15.45%45.60%53.28%-32.19%25.46%47.54%12.64%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
29.01%13.13%17.39%5.72%41.33%80.55%-27.98%-5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TEC.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.09

The correlation between TEC.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TEC.TO
ENCC.TO

Technology

64.4%

-

Communication Services

17.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%

-

Financial Services

3.6%

-

Industrials

1.2%

-

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TEC.TO
64.4%
ENCC.TO

-

Communication Services

TEC.TO
17.7%
ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TEC.TO
11.8%
ENCC.TO

-

Financial Services

TEC.TO
3.6%
ENCC.TO

-

Industrials

TEC.TO
1.2%
ENCC.TO

-

Healthcare

TEC.TO
0.7%
ENCC.TO

-

Real Estate

TEC.TO
0.5%
ENCC.TO

-

Basic Materials

TEC.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

TEC.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Energy

TEC.TO

-

ENCC.TO
100.0%

Utilities

TEC.TO

-

ENCC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEC.TO
TEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEC.TOENCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.93

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

17.54

-10.62

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEC.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEC.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.98

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.11

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.00

+0.97

Drawdowns

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEC.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEC.TO and ENCC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEC.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.31%

-89.91%

+54.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.52%

-8.48%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

-16.67%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

-25.57%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.99%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-39.82%

+31.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

2.38%

+3.51%

Volatility

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) is 4.75%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that TEC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEC.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

5.66%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

12.36%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

14.08%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.32%

23.03%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

29.05%

-5.27%

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TEC.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

TEC.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TEC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF
11.09%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
0.10%0.13%0.12%0.21%0.31%0.22%0.33%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TEC.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TEC.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TEC.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

TEC.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TD and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TEC.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEC.TO and ENCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer