TDOG vs. EZBC
TDOG (21Shares Dogecoin ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - TDOG tracks the Dogecoin (DOGE) while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDOG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
TDOG vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TDOG
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -16.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -32.60%
- YTD
- -26.62%
- 1Y
- -46.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDOG vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TDOG 21Shares Dogecoin ETF | -41.78% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -28.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDOG and EZBC is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDOG vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
TDOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC
TDOG vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDOG | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDOG vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.14%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOG and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDOG | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -53.35% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.07% | -48.92% | +6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -17.75% | -6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 33.13% | — |
Volatility
TDOG vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDOG | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.51% | 44.30% | +19.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 49.84% | +13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.51% | 49.84% | +13.67% |
TDOG vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDOG vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
Neither TDOG nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TDOG and EZBC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDOG.
TDOG and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TDOG tracks Dogecoin (DOGE), while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TDOG and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for TDOG and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer