PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

TDOC.TO (TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF) and ZUH.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. TDOC.TO is actively managed, while ZUH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TDOC.TO returned 5.10%/yr vs -1.59%/yr for ZUH.TO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDOC.TO achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than ZUH.TO's 4.66% return.

TDOC.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.81%
6M
-3.26%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
—

ZUH.TO

1D
0.08%
1M
5.94%
6M
1.76%
YTD
4.66%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
1.75%
5Y*
-1.59%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TDOC.TO
TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF		0.57%8.36%10.24%1.71%-1.37%15.59%
ZUH.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF		4.66%6.34%-3.86%-1.73%-15.65%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.75

The correlation between TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF

BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF

Often compared with ZUH.TO:
ZUH.TO vs. XHC.TOZUH.TO vs. HHL.TOZUH.TO vs. LMAX.TOZUH.TO vs. HHLE.TOZUH.TO vs. ZNQ.TOZUH.TO vs. VHTZUH.TO vs. ZQQ.TO

Return for Risk

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TDOC.TO
TDOC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDOC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDOC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDOC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TDOC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDOC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
ZUH.TO
ZUH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ZUH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TDOC.TOZUH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.90
1.13

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.40
1.75

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.57

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

3.84

-1.25

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDOC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the ZUH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDOC.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.52%, smaller than the maximum ZUH.TO drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TDOC.TOZUH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-34.21%

+16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-11.59%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.66%

-22.23%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.52%

-34.21%

+16.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.21%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-15.64%

+11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-9.24%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

4.72%

+0.22%

Volatility

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC.TO) is 5.09%, while BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUH.TO) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that TDOC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TDOC.TOZUH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

5.82%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

11.96%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

16.21%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

17.39%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

18.56%

-5.63%

Dividends

TDOC.TO vs. ZUH.TO - Dividend Comparison

TDOC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than ZUH.TO's 0.52% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDOC.TO
TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF		1.19%1.09%3.68%0.98%1.16%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZUH.TO
BMO Equal Weight US Health Care Hedged to CAD Index ETF		0.52%0.55%0.74%0.73%0.43%0.12%0.37%0.33%0.33%0.36%0.98%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: TD and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDOC.TO and ZUH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer