TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L
TDIV.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - TDIV.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index while XDEV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.L returned 13.83%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for XDEV.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TDIV.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.
Performance
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TDIV.L is traded in USD, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDIV.L achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.L has outperformed XDEV.L with an annualized return of 13.83%, while XDEV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
TDIV.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
XDEV.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 28.27%
- 1Y
- 55.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.89%
- 5Y*
- 16.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.84% | 40.41% | 8.93% | 15.44% | 9.29% | 18.14% | -2.30% | 37.03% | -6.76% | 3.94% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 28.27% | 40.36% | 5.01% | 19.23% | -9.79% | 20.57% | -4.03% | 19.16% | -14.37% | 22.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDIV.L and XDEV.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TDIV.L and XDEV.L has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank
TDIV.L
XDEV.L
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDIV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.59 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 6.28 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 22.33 | -6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.L and XDEV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDIV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -50.32% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.27% | -8.73% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -18.80% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -26.72% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.94% | -41.02% | +3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.40% | +5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -21.77% | +17.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.46% | -0.58% |
Volatility
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) is 2.90%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that TDIV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDIV.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 5.93% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 14.00% | -5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 16.26% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 20.88% | -6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 22.09% | -5.89% |
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TDIV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TDIV.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
TDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, while XDEV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.10% | 3.49% | 4.36% | 4.82% | 4.49% | 4.14% | 3.88% | 4.37% | 5.77% | 4.50% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TDIV.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.L.
TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.
Find the right allocation for TDIV.L and XDEV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer