PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDIV.L achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than MVOL.L's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TDIV.L has outperformed MVOL.L with an annualized return of 13.78%, while MVOL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.


TDIV.L

1D
0.57%
1M
1.72%
6M
10.29%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
22.59%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
13.78%

MVOL.L

1D
0.65%
1M
1.99%
6M
2.88%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDIV.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.48%40.41%8.93%15.44%9.29%18.14%-2.30%37.03%-6.76%3.94%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
2.60%11.02%11.08%7.28%-9.62%14.65%2.56%22.56%-2.40%17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TDIV.L and MVOL.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.65

The correlation between TDIV.L and MVOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDIV.L
TDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDIV.LMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.11

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

0.81

+4.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

1.76

+13.89

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDIV.L and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, which is greater than MVOL.L's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDIV.L and MVOL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDIV.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.94%

-28.82%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.27%

-5.78%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-8.15%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-18.52%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.94%

-28.82%

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.01%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.30%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.65%

-0.77%

Volatility

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) at 2.29%. This indicates that TDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDIV.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.29%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

6.07%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

7.87%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

10.67%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

11.62%

+4.58%

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDIV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDIV.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

TDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while MVOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.11%3.49%4.36%4.82%4.49%4.14%3.88%4.37%5.77%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDIV.L and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVOL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVOL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.L.

TDIV.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index, while MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for TDIV.L and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDIV.L and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer