TDG vs. CSW
TDG (TransDigm Group Incorporated) and CSW (CSW Industrials Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — TDG in Aerospace & Defense, CSW in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past year, TDG returned -6.51% vs -8.02% for CSW. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TDG vs. CSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDG achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly higher than CSW's -7.13% return.
TDG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- -6.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 17.95%
- 10Y*
- 22.72%
CSW
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -7.13%
- 6M
- -14.57%
- 1Y
- -8.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDG vs. CSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | -5.55% | -3.04% |
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | -7.13% | -4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between TDG and CSW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
TDG:
$73.10B
CSW:
$4.55B
TDG:
$34.79
CSW:
$6.68
TDG:
36.10
CSW:
40.71
TDG:
1.07
CSW:
2.65
TDG:
7.69
CSW:
4.21
TDG:
$9.50B
CSW:
$1.08B
TDG:
$5.61B
CSW:
$453.68M
TDG:
$4.78B
CSW:
$211.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TDG vs. CSW — Risk / Return Rank
TDG
CSW
TDG vs. CSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) and CSW Industrials Inc (CSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TDG | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | -0.33 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | -0.54 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TDG vs. CSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDG drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, which is greater than CSW's maximum drawdown of -25.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDG and CSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDG | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.64% | -25.35% | -37.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.30% | -24.56% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.18% | -18.67% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -13.86% | +5.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | 14.90% | -0.15% |
Volatility
TDG vs. CSW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is 9.84%, while CSW Industrials Inc (CSW) has a volatility of 12.34%. This indicates that TDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TDG | CSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 12.34% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.88% | 30.67% | -8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 40.46% | -12.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 40.37% | -12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 40.37% | -6.54% |
Dividends
TDG vs. CSW - Dividend Comparison
TDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than CSW's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSW CSW Industrials Inc | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDG TransDigm Group Incorporated | 7.17% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 3.46% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.16% | 0.00% | 8.01% | 9.64% |
Financials
TDG vs. CSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransDigm Group Incorporated and CSW Industrials Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TDG vs. CSW - Profitability Comparison
TDG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.
CSW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a gross profit of 126.61M and revenue of 308.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
TDG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
CSW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported an operating income of 37.44M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
TDG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TransDigm Group Incorporated reported a net income of 535.00M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 21.0%.
CSW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CSW Industrials Inc reported a net income of 20.20M and revenue of 308.96M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TDG and CSW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSW has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to TDG (9.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDG dropped -62.64% vs CSW's -25.35%.
CSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TDG and CSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer