TDF vs. FHKTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX).
TDF is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments. FHKTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
TDF vs. FHKTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TDF vs. FHKTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | -4.88% | 37.70% | 5.44% | -20.06% | -32.93% | -18.02% | 52.98% | 27.97% | -11.80% | 42.09% |
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 5.37% | 41.85% | 22.53% | -0.84% | -24.32% | -14.20% | 46.95% | 34.26% | -17.96% | 50.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TDF achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FHKTX's 5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TDF has underperformed FHKTX with an annualized return of 4.59%, while FHKTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
TDF
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -7.24%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.14%
- 5Y*
- -9.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.59%
FHKTX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TDF vs. FHKTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
TDF vs. FHKTX — Risk / Return Rank
TDF
FHKTX
TDF vs. FHKTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TDF | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.83 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.38 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 2.46 | -1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.60 | 9.52 | -6.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TDF | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.83 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.09 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.52 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TDF and FHKTX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TDF vs. FHKTX - Dividend Comparison
TDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FHKTX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | 3.77% | 3.55% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 12.73% | 14.13% | 24.72% | 10.75% | 12.43% | 7.95% | 10.34% | 22.49% |
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 1.20% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.27% | 0.29% | 10.88% | 4.51% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 14.81% |
Drawdowns
TDF vs. FHKTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TDF drawdown since its inception was -68.15%, which is greater than FHKTX's maximum drawdown of -58.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDF and FHKTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TDF | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.15% | -58.83% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -15.99% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.07% | -54.25% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.87% | -58.83% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.36% | -10.83% | -37.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -19.28% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 4.13% | +0.67% |
Volatility
TDF vs. FHKTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) is 6.03%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that TDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TDF | FHKTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 9.27% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 16.43% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.72% | 23.16% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.18% | 23.96% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 22.09% | +1.79% |