PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. VNAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. VNAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than VNAM's -1.29% return.


TDEC

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.78%
6M
10.67%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VNAM

1D
1.12%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
2.35%
1Y
44.43%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. VNAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
8.78%21.39%-0.70%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-1.29%67.05%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and VNAM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. VNAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. VNAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDECVNAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.62

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

7.68

+4.56

TDEC vs. VNAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the VNAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and VNAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDECVNAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

1.66

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.78

-0.02

+1.79

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. VNAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum VNAM drawdown of -52.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and VNAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECVNAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-52.84%

+42.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-17.03%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-7.98%

+7.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-30.52%

+29.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

5.82%

-3.97%

Volatility

TDEC vs. VNAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) is 2.72%, while Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that TDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDECVNAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

6.59%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.03%

19.89%

-10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

26.86%

-16.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

25.60%

-13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

25.60%

-13.87%

TDEC vs. VNAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VNAM's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDEC vs. VNAM - Dividend Comparison

TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.50%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDEC and VNAM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNAM has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to TDEC (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs VNAM's -52.84%.

On 1-year performance, VNAM leads with 44.43% vs 22.62% for TDEC. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VNAM has performed better with a 44.43% return vs 22.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

VNAM has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VNAM is Emerging Markets Equities. TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.51% for VNAM.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDEC and VNAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer