PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDEC vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDEC vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDEC achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 7.19% return.


TDEC

1D
-2.13%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
7.66%
6M
8.74%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
7.19%
6M
6.77%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDEC vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
7.66%21.39%-0.75%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
7.19%19.43%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TDEC and DOGG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDEC vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDEC vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TDECDOGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.18

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

4.86

+5.95

TDEC vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDEC and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TDEC vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDEC drawdown since its inception was -10.30%, smaller than the maximum DOGG drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDEC and DOGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDECDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-11.19%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.29%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-5.78%

+3.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-3.25%

+2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

3.71%

-1.82%

Volatility

TDEC vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 4.04%. This indicates that TDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDECDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.04%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

8.26%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

10.66%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.97%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.97%

-0.94%

TDEC vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDEC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TDEC vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.72%8.75%9.92%5.89%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDEC and DOGG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDEC has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DOGG (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TDEC dropped -10.30% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 20.35% vs 18.00% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 18.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.72%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

TDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DOGG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TDEC and 0.75% for DOGG.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDEC and DOGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer