PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TDB.TO achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TDB.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 1.60%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.


TDB.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.60%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.60%

ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDB.TO
TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.60%2.24%4.11%6.57%-10.94%-2.98%8.31%6.24%1.46%2.55%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TDB.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016

-0.01

The correlation between TDB.TO and ZEB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDB.TO
TDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TDB.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.90

-0.77

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

7.17

-6.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

30.84

-28.30

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TDB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TDB.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TDB.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

4.79

-4.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

1.35

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.94

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.88

-0.62

Drawdowns

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDB.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDB.TO and ZEB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TDB.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.29%

-39.69%

+22.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-8.44%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.11%

-14.80%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.14%

-25.97%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.29%

-39.69%

+22.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-2.00%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-5.65%

+0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.96%

-0.78%

Volatility

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO) is 1.64%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TDB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TDB.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

4.89%

-3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

11.14%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

12.62%

-8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

13.52%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.59%

16.91%

-10.32%

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDB.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TDB.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

TDB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDB.TO
TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.51%3.71%4.11%4.11%2.67%2.37%2.38%2.05%4.32%2.94%2.45%0.00%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


TDB.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDB.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

TDB.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. TDB.TO tracks Solactive Broad Canadian Bond Universe Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for TDB.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TDB.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer