TDAX vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TDAX (TDAQ Lift ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TDAX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by TappAlpha, while OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TDAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

TDAX vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TDAQ Lift ETF (TDAX) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TDAX

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -4.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.18%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TDAX vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF	12.52%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TDAX and OMAH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026	0.16

Return for Risk

TDAX vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TDAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 53
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 42
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TDAX vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TDAQ Lift ETF (TDAX) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TDAX	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.80	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.02	—

Drawdowns

TDAX vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TDAX and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TDAX	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.69%	-11.83%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.58%	-1.65%	-5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-1.27%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TDAX	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.95%	8.03%	+18.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	13.01%	+13.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.95%	13.01%	+13.94%

TDAX vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TDAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TDAX vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

TDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, less than OMAH's 14.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.01%	12.86%
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF	9.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TDAX and OMAH in my portfolio?

TDAX and OMAH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TDAX or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TDAX or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TDAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TDAX or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 9.01% for TDAX.

What is the main difference between TDAX and OMAH?

TDAX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OMAH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TDAX and 0.95% for OMAH.