PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCPYX vs. TEQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) and Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCPYX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than TEQAX's 12.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TCPYX has underperformed TEQAX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while TEQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


TCPYX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.37%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.55%

TEQAX

1D
1.27%
1M
6.16%
YTD
12.38%
6M
14.10%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
0.31%6.75%1.77%5.32%-13.07%-1.01%6.72%7.91%0.16%3.94%
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
12.38%29.86%8.94%23.45%-17.07%11.86%14.44%23.18%-9.72%25.74%

Correlation

The correlation between TCPYX and TEQAX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

-0.13

The correlation between TCPYX and TEQAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TCPYX vs. TEQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCPYX
TCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQAX
TEQAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TEQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) and Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCPYXTEQAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.62

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.31

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.25

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

8.43

-3.06

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the TEQAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCPYX and TEQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCPYXTEQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.62

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.56

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.65

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.43

+0.26

Drawdowns

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCPYX drawdown since its inception was -18.12%, smaller than the maximum TEQAX drawdown of -61.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPYX and TEQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCPYXTEQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.12%

-61.14%

+43.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-11.23%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.79%

-14.29%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-35.95%

+17.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.12%

-35.95%

+17.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

0.00%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-17.80%

+14.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.99%

-2.03%

Volatility

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) is 1.47%, while Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund (TEQAX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that TCPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCPYXTEQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

5.26%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

13.11%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

16.01%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

18.55%

-12.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

18.17%

-13.32%

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCPYX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than TEQAX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

TCPYX vs. TEQAX - Dividend Comparison

TCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, which matches TEQAX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCPYX
Touchstone Impact Bond Fund
3.94%3.52%3.68%3.22%2.63%1.91%2.13%2.63%2.86%2.77%2.98%2.91%
TEQAX
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund
3.91%4.40%3.51%1.46%7.21%12.19%0.33%3.80%10.50%13.02%0.55%51.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


TCPYX and TEQAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEQAX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TCPYX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCPYX dropped -18.12% vs TEQAX's -61.14%.

TEQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TCPYX and TEQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer