TCPYX vs. SWRLX
TCPYX (Touchstone Impact Bond Fund) and SWRLX (Touchstone International Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - TCPYX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Touchstone, while SWRLX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Touchstone. Over the past 10 years, TCPYX returned 1.55%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for SWRLX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TCPYX charges 0.51%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for SWRLX.
Performance
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCPYX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than SWRLX's 23.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TCPYX has underperformed SWRLX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while SWRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
TCPYX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
SWRLX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 23.43%
- 6M
- 24.48%
- 1Y
- 52.80%
- 3Y*
- 24.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 0.75% | 6.75% | 1.77% | 5.32% | -13.07% | -1.01% | 6.72% | 7.91% | 0.16% | 3.94% |
SWRLX Touchstone International Equity Fund | 23.43% | 53.78% | -1.53% | 17.63% | -11.02% | 3.86% | 7.47% | 25.87% | -16.81% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCPYX and SWRLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009 | -0.08 |
The correlation between TCPYX and SWRLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCPYX vs. SWRLX — Risk / Return Rank
TCPYX
SWRLX
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCPYX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.64 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 4.51 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 16.69 | -11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCPYX drawdown since its inception was -18.12%, smaller than the maximum SWRLX drawdown of -59.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCPYX and SWRLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCPYX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.12% | -59.44% | +41.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -11.49% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.79% | -14.08% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.12% | -34.19% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.12% | -35.95% | +17.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | 0.00% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -11.61% | +8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 3.10% | -2.08% |
Volatility
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) is 1.14%, while Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that TCPYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCPYX | SWRLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 5.97% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 12.81% | -9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 14.98% | -11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 17.52% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 16.89% | -12.04% |
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCPYX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRLX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCPYX vs. SWRLX - Dividend Comparison
TCPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than SWRLX's 6.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRLX Touchstone International Equity Fund | 6.18% | 7.63% | 10.53% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 14.95% | 0.46% | 9.10% | 15.19% | 3.61% | 0.66% | 3.76% |
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund | 3.92% | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.63% | 2.86% | 2.77% | 2.98% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCPYX and SWRLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWRLX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to TCPYX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCPYX dropped -18.12% vs SWRLX's -59.44%.
SWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCPYX and SWRLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer