TCMIX vs. YACKX
TCMIX (AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund) and YACKX (AMG Yacktman Fund) are both mutual funds - TCMIX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by AMG, while YACKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, TCMIX returned 5.98%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for YACKX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TCMIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for YACKX.
Performance
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCMIX achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TCMIX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 5.98%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.06% annualized return.
TCMIX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
YACKX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 26.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCMIX AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund | 5.98% | 30.70% | 1.62% | 10.26% | -27.80% | 1.49% | 13.90% | 29.81% | -24.29% | 38.86% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 14.73% | 19.64% | 4.83% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 17.71% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCMIX and YACKX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.67 |
The correlation between TCMIX and YACKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCMIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
TCMIX
YACKX
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund (TCMIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 3.96 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 11.76 | -9.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCMIX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCMIX and YACKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.86% | -46.65% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -6.86% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -13.66% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.42% | -19.86% | -23.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.86% | -30.93% | -12.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -4.80% | +1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -5.10% | -7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 2.30% | +1.58% |
Volatility
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund (TCMIX) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 3.98%. This indicates that TCMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCMIX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 3.98% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 9.91% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 11.69% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 12.95% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 13.78% | +3.51% |
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCMIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
TCMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than YACKX's 15.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCMIX AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund | 1.08% | 1.15% | 3.10% | 1.98% | 1.14% | 1.27% | 0.10% | 1.77% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 1.95% | 5.03% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 15.47% | 17.75% | 9.70% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 9.31% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TCMIX and YACKX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCMIX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to YACKX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCMIX dropped -43.86% vs YACKX's -46.65%.
YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCMIX and YACKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer