PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLV.TO achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than CLSA.TO's -0.37% return.


TCLV.TO

1D
1.26%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
0.94%
6M
6.11%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

CLSA.TO

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TCLV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSA.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLV.TO
TCLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TCLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSA.TO
CLSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) and Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TCLV.TOCLSA.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

3.34

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

3.91

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.66

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

5.26

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.78

20.94

-7.15

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the CLSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLV.TO and CLSA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TCLV.TOCLSA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.34

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

3.19

-1.89

Correlation

The correlation between TCLV.TO and CLSA.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

TCLV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than CLSA.TO's 11.56% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TCLV.TO
TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF
1.92%1.89%2.68%3.15%2.84%2.64%1.59%
CLSA.TO
Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF
11.56%7.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, which is greater than CLSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLV.TO and CLSA.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TCLV.TOCLSA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-11.73%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

-10.78%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-6.70%

+3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-1.46%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

2.71%

-1.35%

Volatility

TCLV.TO vs. CLSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Q Canadian Low Volatility ETF (TCLV.TO) is 3.66%, while Brompton Split Corp. Enhanced Equity Income ETF (CLSA.TO) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that TCLV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TCLV.TOCLSA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

9.17%

-5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

12.04%

-5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

17.07%

-7.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

17.03%

-7.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.81%

17.03%

-7.22%