TCLNX vs. WELL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and Welltower Inc. (WELL).

TCLNX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2004.

Performance

TCLNX vs. WELL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TCLNX vs. WELL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund	-3.29%	13.93%	9.81%	14.38%	-15.45%	10.92%	14.22%	20.95%	-7.31%	16.52%
WELL Welltower Inc.	6.90%	49.86%	43.07%	41.79%	-21.18%	36.98%	-17.19%	23.04%	15.31%	0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TCLNX achieves a -3.29% return, which is significantly lower than WELL's 6.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TCLNX has underperformed WELL with an annualized return of 7.54%, while WELL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.

TCLNX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -5.93%
• YTD: -3.29%
• 6M: -1.21%
• 1Y: 10.33%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: 4.81%
• 10Y*: 7.54%

WELL

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -4.54%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 11.81%
• 1Y: 31.19%
• 3Y*: 43.37%
• 5Y*: 25.13%
• 10Y*: 15.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TCLNX vs. WELL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TCLNX

TCLNX Risk / Return Rank: 61
TCLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TCLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TCLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
TCLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TCLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

WELL

WELL Risk / Return Rank: 81
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TCLNX vs. WELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and Welltower Inc. (WELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TCLNX	WELL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.47	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.97	-0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.26	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	2.46	-1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.82	6.07	-0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TCLNX vs. WELL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TCLNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the WELL Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TCLNX and WELL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TCLNX	WELL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	1.47	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	1.08	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.48	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.56	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between TCLNX and WELL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TCLNX vs. WELL - Dividend Comparison

TCLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than WELL's 1.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund	4.89%	4.73%	3.11%	1.85%	5.67%	7.57%	4.92%	3.60%	6.59%	2.46%	5.13%	4.95%
WELL Welltower Inc.	1.46%	1.52%	2.03%	2.71%	3.72%	2.84%	4.18%	4.26%	5.01%	5.46%	5.14%	4.85%

Drawdowns

TCLNX vs. WELL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TCLNX drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, smaller than the maximum WELL drawdown of -63.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLNX and WELL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TCLNX	WELL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.89%	-63.33%	+11.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-12.61%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-40.78%	+19.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.48%	-63.33%	+37.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.26%	-7.92%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.95%	-10.37%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	5.11%	-3.49%

Volatility

TCLNX vs. WELL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) is 3.15%, while Welltower Inc. (WELL) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that TCLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TCLNX	WELL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	6.70%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	14.89%	-9.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.51%	21.26%	-11.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.78%	23.52%	-13.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.05%	31.83%	-20.78%