TCLNX vs. URTRX
TCLNX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund) and URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, TCLNX returned 7.95%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for URTRX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TCLNX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for URTRX.
Performance
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TCLNX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than URTRX's 8.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TCLNX having a 7.95% annualized return and URTRX not far behind at 7.71%.
TCLNX
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.47%
URTRX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund | 5.18% | 13.93% | 9.81% | 14.38% | -15.45% | 10.92% | 14.22% | 20.95% | -7.31% | 16.52% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 8.39% | 14.78% | 8.09% | 13.98% | -13.23% | 12.23% | 9.25% | 17.13% | -6.98% | 16.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TCLNX and URTRX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2008 | 0.97 |
The correlation between TCLNX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TCLNX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank
TCLNX
URTRX
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TCLNX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.90 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 12.19 | -4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TCLNX drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than URTRX's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TCLNX and URTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TCLNX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -34.10% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -5.29% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.61% | -9.12% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -19.52% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | -23.56% | -1.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.28% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -4.12% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.25% | +0.22% |
Volatility
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund (TCLNX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 2.00%. This indicates that TCLNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TCLNX | URTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 2.00% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.84% | 6.61% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.20% | 7.81% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 9.76% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 10.31% | +0.68% |
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TCLNX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TCLNX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison
TCLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than URTRX's 6.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCLNX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2030 Fund | 4.50% | 4.73% | 3.11% | 1.85% | 5.67% | 7.57% | 4.92% | 3.60% | 6.59% | 2.46% | 5.13% | 4.95% |
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 6.25% | 6.78% | 3.16% | 4.24% | 9.53% | 7.66% | 4.53% | 11.43% | 8.54% | 8.10% | 4.06% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TCLNX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TCLNX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to URTRX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TCLNX dropped -51.89% vs URTRX's -34.10%.
URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TCLNX and URTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer